Media Contact

CONTACT: Katie Beall media@aclumontana.org ǀ 406-203-3374

A coalition of ten organizations today submitted comments urging Attorney General Tim Fox to find that a proposed anti-transgender ballot initiative deliberately targets Montana’s LGBTQ community, is legally insufficient, and would violate Montanans’ constitutional rights.

The Coalition for Dignity and Safety, a coalition of organizations fighting for the rights of Montana’s LGBT community, oppose the ballot initiative (The Montana Locker Room Privacy Act or MLRPA) which misleads voters with its ballot language and strikes at the fundamental rights of fairness, equality and dignity of all Montanans and, particularly, attacks the humanity of transgender and gender non-conforming Montanans.

“Montanans want to live their lives with dignity and safety and they want that for their neighbors, too,” said Shawn Reagor of the Montana Human Rights Network. “Policies like this are unnecessary, unenforceable, and discriminate against transgender people. This policy will have serious unintended consequences that will harm our state.”

The MLRPA erases Montanans’ constitutional rights in exchange for legalized discrimination. These rights include: the right to individual privacy, Montana’s equal protection clause, the right to individual dignity, the right to due process, and the right to freedom of religion.

Similar attempts to pass anti-transgender laws by ballot have underestimated public opposition to anti-equality measures. Just this month in Washington State, and for the second consecutive year, an anti-transgender ballot initiative failed to collect sufficient signatures.

In April, the Montana legislature rejected with a bipartisan vote House Bill 609. This “locker room privacy bill,” also championed by the Montana Family Foundation, similarly targeted transgender Montanans and would have forced Montanans to use a bathroom based on the sex specified on their original birth certificates.

"The legislature was given the option to pass a similar law a few months ago and it died there for a reason,” said Caitlin Borgmann, Executive Director of the ACLU of Montana. “Lawmakers from both parties found it too extreme, too costly, and too unworkable. It still is, and we hope Attorney General Fox will recognize that."

Organizations that submitted comments in opposition to the MLRPA include:

The Coalition for Dignity and Safety stands with Montana’s transgender and gender non-conforming communities.

The letter to Attorney General Fox can be found below.

The ACLU of Montana will be managing media inquiries.

[The press release was updated on July 27th with updated information on additional Coalition for Dignity and Safety partner organizations.]

Related Content

News & Commentary
May 17, 2018
I-183 is unconstitutional
  • 2S-LGBTQIA+ Rights

Reasons Why I-183 is Unconstitutional

We have eight reasons why I-183 would be unconstitutional. I-183 would require government officials at the state and local level to prevent Montanans from using bathrooms and other public facilities based on a medically inaccurate and subjective assessment of a person’s gender. This violates Montanans’ fundamental rights to privacy and dignity.The measure prevents transgender and non-binary Montanans from having equal access to public facilities because of their gender identity.The initiative subjects all Montanans to scrutiny of their gender expression, and invades their privacy and individual dignity. Any Montanan could be stopped by government officials and private individuals if another person does not think they satisfy stereotypes of what it means to be ‘masculine’ or ‘feminine.’The initiative would force transgender and non-binary Montanans out of public life and prevent them from pursuing life’s basic necessities – in this case, using the bathroom in a public building.The measure forces the government to interfere with an individual’s right to make private decisions about which public facilities they should use.Because I-183 defines sex as “a person’s immutable biological sex as objectively determined by anatomy and genetics existing at the time of birth,” state and local governments would be forced to access private medical information to determine what facility an individual should use.The measure would gut nondiscrimination laws put in place by cities throughout Montana, including Butte, Bozeman, Missoula, Helena, and Whitefish.I-183 is vague and unenforceable. Montanans and local governments charged with enforcing I-183 have no guidance on how to comply with I-183’s requirements and as a result would be exposed to costly lawsuits.  The “bounty” provision of I-183 empowers vigilantes to sue local governments when they believe an individual is not using the facility that corresponds with the sex assigned on an original birth certificate. 
News & Commentary
Aug 11, 2017
josh nichols
  • 2S-LGBTQIA+ Rights

Tweets Won't Stop LGBTQ Service to Country

I started my military career two years after President Obama made the long overdue decision to repeal the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy in 2010.
Press Release
Jun 30, 2018
I-183 victory
  • 2S-LGBTQIA+ Rights

Montanans Stand with Trans and Non-Binary Community, Reject Discrimination and I-183 Ballot Initiative

Issue Areas: 2S-LGBTQIA+ Rights
Press Release
Jul 31, 2017
legal suff
  • 2S-LGBTQIA+ Rights

ACLU of Montana Challenges the Legal Sufficiency of Anti-LGBTQ Ballot Initiative

Issue Areas: 2S-LGBTQIA+ Rights